Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Liberty Care Plan v. Department of Insurance

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 5, 1998No. 96-3909Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBenton, Judge

In the course of administrative proceedings below, Liberty Care Plan did not request an evidentiary hearing on its petition for declaratory statement. Nor did the Department of Insurance order such a hearing, as it had authority to do under Florida Administrative Code Rule 4-121.043(2). Although the question is not free from doubt, see Sun Coast Home Care, Inc. v. State Department of Insurance, 710 So.2d 120 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), I agree with the majority that the Department had enough information to decide the merits of the Liberty Care Plan petition.

As to the “Level I” contract, I concur in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brock v. HardieSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. State, Ex Rel. Landis v. De Witt C. Jones Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. State Ex Rel. Long v. MynattTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Sun Coast Home Care, Inc. v. State, Department of InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API