Legal Opinion

Willett v. New York Central Rd. Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 1943No. 6326PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthews, J.

One of the assignments of error— the second — is that the court erred in overruling defendant’s motion for a new trial. One ground alleged in such motion was misconduct.on the part of a juror.

This appeal now comes before this court upon the plaintiff’s motion to strike the second assignment of error from the files on the ground that it relates “to matters not appearing on the record in this case and .therefore not subject to consideration by this court in the absence of a bill of exceptions.”

Several affidavits were filed with the motion for a new trial. They were referred to in the motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simes v. Dayton-Xenia Ry Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Workman v. Green Cab Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Richlin v. Gooding Amusement Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Allstate Insurance v. DyeOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Rukavina v. New York Central RailroadOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Bailey v. Progressive Motor Sales, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. E. W. Bohren, Inc. v. DanglerOhio Court of Appeals · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API