Pike Electric Co. v. Richardson Drug Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court.— Hón. Daniel D. Fisher, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This action is brought to recover the reasonable value of certain labor and materials, furnished by the plaintiff to the defendant under the written contract below set out. The action is not brought to recover the price named in the contract, because, before the contract was completed by the plaintiff, and while it was in process of completion, the premises of the defendant were destroyed by an accidental fire, consuming all the materials which, by the terms of the contract, the plaintiff had agreed ,to furnish, and rendering valueless the labor already done thereunder. The contract in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hunt v. WymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Haynes, Spencer & Co. v. Second Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
- Richardson v. KochSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Graves v. PierceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Pierce v. CooleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wesco Supply Co. v. Incorporated Town of AllertonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Chicago Edison Co. v. Huyett & Smith Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1896