Legal Opinion
Hogan v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 16, 1943No. Gen. No. 41,889PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Sullivan
delivered the opinion of the court.
Plaintiffs, Elizabeth Hogan and Mary Burke, brought separate actions against defendant, City of Chicago, to recover damages for personal injuries. The injuries were alleged to have been sustained by plaintiffs when the automobile in which they were riding was struck by an automobile owned and operated by one Sam Jones, an employee of the City of Chicago. The actions were consolidated in the trial court. The cause was tried before the court and jury and a verdict was returned finding the defendant guilty and. assessing…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McCarthy v. SoutherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
- American Savings Life Insurance v. RiplingerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Wesolowski v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Auer v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
- Miller v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Richard v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Sloma v. PflugerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
- Konick v. Berke, Moore Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Lois M. Cobb, Individually and as of the Will of Russell E. Cobb, Deceased v. Robert Kumm and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Ritter v. TaucherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.