Legal Opinion

State v. Quintanilla

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 3, 2013No. 30769-7-IIIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

¶1 Jorge L. Quintanilla appeals his conviction and sentence for use of extortionate means to collect *176extensions of credit. He contends (1) sufficient evidence does not exist to support his conviction, (2) he was denied effective assistance of counsel, and (3) the sentencing court erred in failing to total his legal financial obligations (LFOs). We find no error and affirm.

FACTS

¶2 On the surface, Mr. Quintanilla operated a seafood distribution business. According to Mr. Quintanilla, a man he briefly knew as Miguel Gonzalez (initially known to Mr. Quintanilla by other names) invested $5,000 in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
State v. GrierWashington Supreme Court · 2011
State v. DelmarterWashington Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Sara Hartman, App v. The Young Men's Christian Assoc Of Greater Seattle, D/b/a, RespCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015