Legal Opinion
Engineered Arresting Sys. Corp. v. Atech, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided September 24, 2018No. Case No.: 5:14-CV-00518-MHHPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Engineered Arresting Systems Corporation (ESCO) claims that the defendants Atech, Inc., SCAMA AB, Philip Ahagen, and Harald Ahagen infringed on ESCO's "BAK-12" and "PORTARREST" trademarks in violation of the Lanham Act when the defendants responded to a United States Air Force solicitation for BAK-12 and PORTARREST-IV/BAK-12 mobile aircraft arresting systems. (Doc. 39, p. 17). ESCO also brings claims of false designation of origin and false advertising in violation of the Lanham Act, and common law unfair competition and trademark…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mize v. Jefferson City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Allen v. Board of Public Educ. for Bibb CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Royal Pacific Limited v. Faith Electric Manufacture Company, Ltd.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2022