Legal Opinion

Konecki v. C R Bard Incorporated

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided September 22, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00347Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION NIKI1 KONECKI, § Plaintiff § v. § § CIVIL NO. 1:20-CV-347-LY C. R. BARD, INC. and BARD § PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. § Defendants REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO: THE HONORABLE LEE YEAKEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), filed April 7, 2021 (Dkt. 27); Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Rule 41(b) Motion to Dismiss, filed April 21, 2021 (Dkt. 28); and Defendants’ Reply, filed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. Bobby Battle v. U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API