Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Twin City State Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1940No. 34,611PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was an action against a bank to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of loss of gold coins and currency deposited in a rented safety-deposit box. Defendant prevailed, and plaintiff appeals.

Between July 1, 1932, and May 21, 1935, inclusive, plaintiff deposited gold coins and currency in a safety-deposit box which he rented from the bank under an oral contract. The contract was later reduced to writing. Part of the gold coins had been given to plaintiff for deposit by a friend. The total deposit was alleged to have…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Perry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Nortz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Morgan v. . BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. RhoadesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. Young v. First Nat. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. DoyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  3. Emigh v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  4. Goodloe v. Jo-Mar Dairies Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  5. Bohmont v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API