Legal Opinion

Neusbaum v. Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1956No. 33928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

This is an action for damages suffered by plaintiff Neusbaum in a crossing accident when a train of defendant struck a truck in which plaintiff Neusbaum was riding. At the close of plaintiffs’ case-in-chief the trial court sustained a motion made by defendant and dismissed plaintiffs’ action. Plaintiffs appeal. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We state the evidence in the light of the established and often repeated rule that in determining such a motion the plaintiff is entitled to have every controverted fact resolved in his favor and to have the benefit of every inference that can…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kepler v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Moreland v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Seiffert v. HinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Milk House Cheese Corp. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Mundt v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Crewdson v. Burlington Northern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Anderson v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Lois Barclay, Special Administratrix of the Estate of Walter Barclay, Jr., Deceased v. Burlington Northern, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. Ecker v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Eldon BeningerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API