Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Richmond

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 6, 1945No. Record No. 2927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The plaintiff, .Mary Hasker Smith, was overcome in her apartment by city gas. The City of Richmond makes gas and furnishes it to its people—to thousands of them.

By motion for judgment, Mrs. Smith asks compensation in damages from the City for injuries suffered. There was a jury trial. When plaintiff had completed her evidence, the City moved that it be stricken out and charged that she had not made out a case. That motion was overruled. After all of the evidence had been introduced, both that tendered on behalf of the plaintiff and that tendered on behalf of the defendant, the City renewed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meade v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
  2. Leath v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  3. McQuown v. PhaupSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Richmond v. Atlantic Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  2. Stephens v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1945
  3. City Of Richmond v. Atlantic CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  4. Simmons v. BoydSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  5. Simmons v. BoydSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API