Legal Opinion

Seiberling Rubber Co. v. United States

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided April 14, 1952No. Civ. No. 24963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

The basis of this suit is the recovery or refund of undistributed profits tax paid by the plaintiff on account of its fiscal year ending October 31, 1938.

The 1936 Act, Revenue Act 1936, § 14, 26 U.S.C.A.Int.Rev.Acts, page 823, imposed a surtax on current year undistributed net income even- where a corporation had an accumulated deficit, and the corporation was prohibited by state law from paying a dividend. The right of recovery is dependent upon whether the taxpayer has brought itself within the remedial provisions of the 1942 amendment, Revenue Act 1942, § 501, 26…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Ogilvie Hardware Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Jones v. FIRST NAT. BLDG. CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  3. George E. Warren Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1948

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. Baltimore Brick CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
  2. Weinberg v. Baltimore Brick Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
  3. Hamilton Mfg. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  4. Weinberg v. Baltimore Brick CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API