Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Boyles v. Department of Retirement Systems

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1986No. 51594-8Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partUtter, J.

(concurring in part, dissenting in part) — I agree with the majority's conclusion that an elected official *509should not lose the right to revert to a prior civil service position for purposes of obtaining disability benefits even when he occupied a noncivil service position immediately before taking elective office. I disagree, however, with the majority's award of attorneys' fees against the Department of Retirement Systems as a sanction for bringing a frivolous appeal. Our decision in the first appeal of this case, Boyles v. Washington Law Enforcement Officers' & Fire Fighters' Retirement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Streater v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  2. Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of Texas v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Boyles v. Washington Law Enforcement Officers' & Fire Fighters' Retirement BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Boyles v. Washington Law Enforcement Officers' & Fire Fighters' Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API