Legal Opinion

Waterloo Water Co. v. Village of Waterloo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the plaintiff, Waterloo Water Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Seneca on the 27th day of October, 1921, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Monroe Special Term, a jury having been waived.

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, J.:

The plaintiff having furnished water to defendant through its hydrants for six months without prior agreement as to rate, sought in this action to recover the reasonable value of the hydrant rental. The defendant on the trial estab’ished its claim that the recovery must be limited by the maximum rate in a “ franchise.” •

To present clearly the issue, it is necessary to state the facts more fully. Having received permission from the trustees of *720defendant village to organize as a water works company as required by statute (Laws of 1873, chap. 737), the plaintiff was incorporated in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Columbus Railway, Power & Light Co. v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. People Ex Rel. Village of South Glens Falls v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Pond v. . New Rochelle Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. People Ex Rel. City of New York v. . NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grimshaw v. Garden City Co.New York Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API