Legal Opinion

In re Reed

United States District Court

Decided July 1, 1844PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This was an application by Timothy Heed, a bankrupt, for a discharge. The facts in the case, as well as the objections filed by the opposing creditors, will sufficiently appear from the opinion delivered by the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPrentiss, J.

Three objections are interposed to the allowance of a discharge to the bankrupt. The first alleges a fraudulent concealment of property, by wilfully omitting to insert in his schedule several articles of personal property, particularly enumerated and specified. This objection requires no farther notice, than to say, that it is not supported by the proofs.

*636The second and third objections may be considered together; the one alleging various fraudulent conveyances and transfers, without any adequateor valid consideration, to certain individuals named in the objections, of real and personal estate…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stoddard v. LockeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871
  2. Rison v. PowellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1873

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API