Legal Opinion

State v. Castillo

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1993No. Nos. 60801, 62083PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Judge.

Appellant, James Castillo appeals his conviction of first degree robbery and armed criminal action. Appellant also filed a notice of appeal of the denial of his motion under Rule 29.15. The appeals were consolidated. Appellant has failed to file a brief on the issues pertaining to his Rule 29.15 motion. An appellant who fails to file a brief, we deem, abandons his appeal. Estate of Welch, 797 S.W.2d 742, 743 (Mo.App.1990). Appellant makes five contentions for reversal of his conviction: (1) the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for sanctions against the state…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. FeltropSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. State v. RoyalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  4. Rayfield Newlon v. William ArmontroutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  5. State v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. State v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. MinnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. ReyesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. State v. BoyceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API