Legal Opinion

Oahu Sugar Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided September 19, 1928No. Docket No. 15852Published

1. Decision in Kahuku Plantation Co.,12 B.T.A. 977, as modified in 13 B.T.A. 292, followed. 2. March 1, 1913, value of leasehold interest in sugar cane lands determined.

1Opinion of the Court

OAHU SUGAR CO., LTD., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Oahu Sugar Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 15852.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

13 B.T.A. 404; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3255;

September 19, 1928, Promulgated

1. Decision in Kahuku Plantation Co.,12 B.T.A. 977, as modified in 13 B.T.A. 292, followed.

2. March 1, 1913, value of leasehold interest in sugar cane lands determined.

A. A. Balantine, Esq., S. Milton Simpson, Esq., and Bernard Knollenberg, Esq., for the petitioner.

M. N. Fisher, Esq., and L. C. Mitchell, Esq., for the respondent.

PHILLIPS

The Commissioner determined a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kahuku Plantation Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
  2. Kahuku Plantation Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
  3. Oahu Sugar Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API