Legal Opinion

General Foods Corp. v. Henderson

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1973No. 9499Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OMAN, Justice.

This is a suit for declaratory judgment pursuant to §§ 22-6-1 to 3, N.M. S.A. 1953. Plaintiff sought to have its product, “Thick & Frosty,” declared not to be a filled dairy product within the meaning of the New Mexico Filled Products Act, which appears as §§ 52-2-5 to 10, N.M.S. A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 8, pt. 1, 1962 and Supp. 1971 thereto). In the alternative, plaintiff challenged the constitutionality of the New Mexico Filled Products Act and the constitutionality of the Act’s application. The case was tried to the court without a jury, and the trial court entered judgment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. 62 Cases of Jam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. McCauley v. RayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. United States v. 88 Cases, More or Less, Containing Bireley's Orange BeverageCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  4. Samora v. BradfordNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. State v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API