Davis v. Randolph
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Johnsonv. Gar-lick, 25 Wis. 705; Mitchell v. Roberts, 27 N. H. 486; Brockway v. Burnap, 12 Barb. 347; Richardson v. Reed et al., 4 Gray, 441; Coffin v. Gephart, 18 Iowa, 257 ; Wag. Stat. 1026, secs. 11-14. cited: Wag. Stat. 1023, sec. 1; Barksdale v. Appleberry, 23 Mo. 389; Nichols v. Michaels, 23 N. Y. 264; Knapp v. Smith, 27 N. Y. 277; Ellis v. Lersner, 48 Barb. 539.
1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.
This is an action in the nature of an action of replevin or detinue, brought under the provisions of the Code for the claim and delivery of personal property.
The property claimed in the petition of plaintiff is one *455portable steam-engine and one steam-thresher and separator, alleged to have been wrongfully detained by defendants. The property is alleged to be worth $1,000, and $200 are asked for damages for its detention. An order of delivery was issued, to which the sheriff made return that he had taken the separator and thresher from defendants, and delivered them to plaintiff; and that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brockway v. BurnapNew York Supreme Court · 1851
- Haughton v. . NewberrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
- Roberts v. RandelThe Superior Court of New York City · 1851
- Johnson v. GarlickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
- Ellis v. LersnerNew York Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sinnott v. . FeiockNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Fawley v. BaileyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. AtkisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
- Feder v. AbrahamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
- Penn v. BrashearMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.