Legal Opinion

Westervelt v. Morrelle

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 6, 1899Published

Appeal from special term. Action by Annie H. Westervelt against Elizabeth T. Morrelle. From an order striking out an answer as defendant appeals.

1Per curiam

Appeal from an order striking out an answer as sham. The action was brought to recover rent under the terms of a written lease. The answer admits the making of the lease, and alleges the cancellation and rescission thereof, together with a counterclaim for $150. The affirmative issues thus raiséd cannot be stricken out as sham. Sham issues in this connection are synonymous with false issues, and to strike them out as sham would be to dispose of the merits on a motion. Wayland v. Tysen, 45 N. Y. 281; Miller v. Hughes, 21 How. Prac. 442; Webb v. Foster, 45 N. Y. Super. Ct. 311; Farnsworth v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wayland v. . TysenNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Barney v. KingNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Farnsworth v. HalsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Miller v. HughesNew York Supreme Court · 1860

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API