Legal Opinion

People v. Guzman

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 2011No. B232299PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, J.

A physician, like any other person, knows that he cannot lawfully obtain money based upon a fraudulent representation. This is theft by false pretenses. (People v. Shirley (1978) 78 Cal.App.3d 424, 436 [144 Cal.Rptr. 282].) A physician should also know that he cannot lawfully submit a Medi-Cal claim representing that he is supplying an expensive FDA-approved intrauterine device when, in fact, he is supplying a cheaper non-FDA-approved intrauterine device.1

Eduardo Jose Guzman, a licensed obstetrician-gynecologist, appeals from the judgment entered after his conviction by a jury…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cutter v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Cavazos v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MoyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  2. People v. MoyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API