People v. Guzman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, J.
A physician, like any other person, knows that he cannot lawfully obtain money based upon a fraudulent representation. This is theft by false pretenses. (People v. Shirley (1978) 78 Cal.App.3d 424, 436 [144 Cal.Rptr. 282].) A physician should also know that he cannot lawfully submit a Medi-Cal claim representing that he is supplying an expensive FDA-approved intrauterine device when, in fact, he is supplying a cheaper non-FDA-approved intrauterine device.1
Eduardo Jose Guzman, a licensed obstetrician-gynecologist, appeals from the judgment entered after his conviction by a jury…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cutter v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Cavazos v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. MoyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- People v. MoyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023