Legal Opinion

Garay Uppen v. Superior Court of Pima County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 16, 1977No. 2 CA-CIV 2537PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

The subject of this special action is a ruling by the respondent court that it lacked jurisdiction to consider, approve and make provision for the custody of petitioner’s minor child in a decree of dissolution. Because of the unusual circumstances, we deem the remedy by appeal inadequate and therefore assume jurisdiction.

Briefly, the facts are as follows. Petitioner and the father of the child were married in Santiago, Chile, on June 7, 1972 and on May 9, 1974, the father abandoned petitioner when she was pregnant with the subject child. The child was born in Chile…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Webb's AdoptionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Allman v. RegisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Simonds v. SimondsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  4. Lyons v. EganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  5. Paronto v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-903.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  2. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. A-27789Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bowen v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Ledoux v. AldridgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Chapp v. HIGH SCH. DIST. NO. 1 OF PIMA CTY.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API