Legal Opinion
Shepherd v. Swatling
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 29, 1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLawrence H. Cooke, J.
Plaintiffs move to examine defendants before trial as to certain stated matters and that said defendants be examined separately and not in the presence of each other. Defendants cross-move to examine plaintiffs Marion R. Shepherd and Dorothy R. Soward.
Rule 129 of the Rules of Civil Practice provides in part: ‘ ‘ On the oral examination of a person whose testimony is to be taken by deposition, either within or without the state, the oral examination shall be conducted in the same manner as on the trial, except that an objection to any question need not be noted, and may be raised upon the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Capitol Cab Corp. v. AndersonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1949
- Winston v. Bendix Home Appliances, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Capitol Cab Corp. v. AndersonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1950
- Honig v. Edlill Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carlisle v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Schwartz v. MarienNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- In re the Estate of CzachorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Kulers v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1988
- Carlisle v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.