Legal Opinion
McCall v. Stern
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided February 12, 1919No. Action of Replevin, No. 59PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Action in replevin by John E. McCall against Milton Stem, trading as the Auto Transit Company, and Joshua Z. Crossland, Sheriff. Petition by defendant Stern for a writ de. retomo habendo pendente lite.
1Per curiam
Where it appears that the officer in charge of the execution of the writ of replevin refused to give reasonable time to the defendant in the writ to give property bond and retain possession of the goods pending the action of replevin, the court -will direct to be issued a unit of de retorno habendo pendente lite, upon the entering of proper and sufficient security by the defendant in the writ of replevin.
2Cited by1 opinion
- In re GouldSuperior Court of Delaware · 1921