Legal Opinion

In re Appeal of Shore

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 7, 1985No. Appeal, No. 3 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

This zoning appeal involves the Solebury Township Zoning Ordinance’s total exclusion of mobilehome *8parks. In a curative amendment proceeding,1 the township’s board of supervisors rejected landowner Arthur Shore’s constitutional attack on the ordinance. From an affirmance by the ¡Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, the landowner appealed to this court.

The central question is whether a total exclusion of mobilehome parks, a legitimate residential use category, is unconstitutional, as .this court has consistently held in a number of ¡decisions,2 or instead is governed by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Surrick v. ZHB OF U. PROVIDENCE TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Beaver Gasoline Co. v. Osborne BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Eller v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. In Re Appeal of M.A. Kravitz Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Borough of Malvern v. JacksonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. In Re Appeal of ShoreCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. In re Appeal of ShoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API