Legal Opinion

Village of Arlington Heights v. Suchocki

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 27, 1980No. 79-1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simon

This case raises a question of notice. The defendants’ trial counsel has been served with the village’s notice of appeal, but he insists that his representation was limited to the trial level. The defendants have not been served and they have moved from their last known address without leaving a forwarding address. The village has filed its brief, but no appearance or brief has been filed on the defendants behalf. The notice intended by the criminal appeals rules has not been given, and we therefore dismiss the appeal.

On November 19, 1978, a country club then under construction and owned by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Village of Maywood v. HoustonIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Village of Park Forest v. BraggIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  3. City of Danville v. HartshornIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Echols v. OlsenIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  5. City of Crystal Lake v. NelsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. PrusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Village of Beckmeyer v. WheelanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. City of Urbana v. FuerstAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API