Legal Opinion
Harris v. Cantu
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided January 26, 2015No. Civil Action No. H-14-1312PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
EWING WERLEIN, JR., District Judge.
Pending are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 24) and' Plaintiffs Replacement Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 28). After carefully considering the motions, responses, replies, and applicable law, the Court concludes for the following reasons that Plaintiffs motion should be granted.
I. Background
The material facts in this case are undisputed. Plaintiff Keith Harris (“Plaintiff’) in 1996 enlisted in the United States Army at the age of 18 in his home state of Georgia.1 Plaintiff served four years in. the Army…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Keith Harris v. Texas Veterans CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Teladoc, Inc. v. Texas Medical BoardDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2015
- ESI/Employee Solutions, LP v. City of DallasDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2020
- ESI/Employee Solutions, LP v. City of DallasDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2021
- Kiewit Offshore Services, Ltd. v. U.S. Department of LaborDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.