Legal Opinion
Shasta Staley v. Martin Gruenberg
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 6, 2014No. 13-1875UnpublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
The President of the United States, through an Executive Order, directed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC” or “Defendant”) to decide promptly whether to convert certain interns to permanent status. After the FDIC decided not to convert Shasta Staley to permanent status, Staley filed a complaint alleging that the FDIC retaliated against her for engaging in protected activities, in violation of Title VT-I of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012); the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12201-12213 (2012); and the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Feist v. Louisiana, Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Allen v. McCarthyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023
- Alston v. HolyCross Health-Trinity Health CareDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- Bryant v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- Dewonou v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Diaz v. Medical Faculty Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2023
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.