Baum v. Crosfield
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The addition of furniture to an unfurnished apartment does not create a new and different housing accommodation. Therefore, the landlord may not collect more than the established maximum rent for the housing accommodation unfurnished unless and until such an order is issued by the rent administrator. The collection of any amount over the established maximum rent prior to the issuance of any such order by the administrator represents an overcharge. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ. [280 App. Div. 805.]
2Cited by6 opinions
- Strunk v. HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Johnson v. AndrewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Laveist v. RobertsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1953
- Spolan v. CapuaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
- Ellenbogen v. GlassmanAlbany City Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.