Legal Opinion

D. H. v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1977No. 2837PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BOOCHEYER, C. J., and RABI-NOWITZ, CONNOR, ERWIN and BURKE, JJ. BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice.

D.H. appeals from a judgment which waived jurisdiction under the Children’s Rules over him at a time when he was 16 years old and permitted the state to prosecute him as an adult. He raises issues as to whether it was error: (1) to permit a probation officer to offer an opinion on his amenability to treatment, (2) to admit into evidence a police officer’s testimony regarding other acts or crimes D.H. stated he considered committing and (3) whether the evidence presented supports the findings…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. P. H. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. INA Life Insurance Company v. BrundinAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Crawford v. RogersAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Adkins v. LesterAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Aurora Air Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Sweet v. Sisters of Providence in WashingtonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In re F. S.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Patricia R. v. SullivanAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Norris v. GattsAlaska Supreme Court · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API