Legal Opinion
Bishop-McKean v. Washington Department of Corrections
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided September 21, 2020No. 3:20-cv-05416Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 RENEE BISHOP-MCKEAN, CASE NO. 3:20-CV-5416-JLR-DWC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE OR 11 v. AMEND 12 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 Plaintiff Renee Bishop-McKean, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil 15 rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Having reviewed and screened Plaintiff’s Second 16 Amended Complaint under 28 U.S.C. §1915A, the Court declines to serve the Second Amended 17 Complaint but provides Plaintiff leave to file an amended pleading by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Donald Robin BARREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom HARRINGTON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Wolfgang Arnold v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.