Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Commonwealth v. Reigel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 2013Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY

SHOGAN, J.:

Because I believe that the majority in this matter has erroneously affirmed the entire judgment of sentence, I am constrained to set forth my dissent. It is undisputed that Appellant is appealing from the judgment of sentence entered following his summary convictions of various Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Code violations. On appeal, Appellant argues that the Municipal Police Jurisdiction Act (“MPJA”), 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 8951-8954, does not authorize a police officer, acting within his primary jurisdiction, to issue a citation for a summary offense…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MarizzaldiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. SestinaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. KositiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Moyer v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API