Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Carman

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 2015No. 2013-SC-000684-CLPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

JUSTICE ABRAMSON

Under Section 115 of the Kentucky Constitution and Kentucky Rule of Civil Procedure (CR) 76.37(10), the Commonwealth, by and through the Jefferson County Attorney, moved this Court to certify the law on the following question:

In light of this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Wilson, 384 S.W.3d 113 (Ky.2012), does Kentucky law authorize ex parte communications to change the conditions of release after the initial fixing of bail with no notice for the Commonwealth to be heard?

The certified question refers to Commonwealth v. Wilson, a case arising from a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. TitreSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
  2. Delahanty v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2018
  3. Com. of Ky. v. CambronCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2018
  4. Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Christopher Gage BlackfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023
  5. Ex Parte Leo G. Smith, Chief Public Defender, Louisville & Jefferson County Public Defender Corporation And, Elizabeth B. McMahon, Deputy Chief Public Defender, Louisville & Jefferson County Public Defender CorporationKentucky Supreme Court · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API