Legal Opinion · Dissent

Martin v. City of Waynesboro

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1990No. 07-CA-59230Published

1DissentDan M. Lee, Presiding Justice

I believe the circuit court judge abused his discretion by dismissing this case. Dismissal is drastic punishment and should not be invoked except when the conduct of the party has been so deliberately careless as to call for drastic action. Peoples Bank v. D’Lo Royalties, Inc., 206 So.2d 836 (Miss.1968); Williams v. Whitfield, 249 Miss. 634, 163 So.2d 688 (1964).

Based solely upon a literal reading of Uniform Circuit Court Rule 4.01, the case below should have been dismissed by May 6, 1987; however, to do so would, in my opinion, result in manifest injustice. This state’s rules of court are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. PeacockMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Dogan, Sheriff v. CooleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Canal Insurance v. HowellMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Morrison v. Guaranty Mortgage & Trust Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Peoples Bank v. D'Lo Royalties, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API