Legal Opinion
In re Marriage of Zorn
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 1, 1992No. 15-90-03136; CA A69545PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
Father appeals the denial of his motion for a reduction of his child support obligation. ORS 107.135. He argues that the trial court failed to apply the Uniform Child Support Guidelines properly. ORS 25.270 —ORS 25.285. On de novo review, we affirm.
At the time of the marriage dissolution, father had a “fairly good income” from two businesses that he owned. After his businesses failed, he moved to Oregon and currently works part-time by choice. He argues that, under the guidelines, he is entitled to a reduction of his child support obligation, because of the change of circumstances.
On a motion…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nelson v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- In re the Marriage of GayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Matter of Marriage of JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Reid v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fehring v. State Insurance FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Kuykendall v. Gulfstream Aerospace TechnologiesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- In re the Marriage of GlitheroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Matter of Marriage of NiblerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002