Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Cline v. Wallichs

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1884PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This is an application to compel the auditor .to draw his warrant on the temporary school fund for the sum of $5,583.35, for the premium on county bonds purchased by the board of educational lands and funds. The account has been audited, and the only objection made by the defendant to drawing the warrant in question is, the want of an appropriation. It is claimed on the part of the relator that there is an implied appropriation of sufficient of the temporary school fund for the purpose of paying the premium on bonds purchased by the board.

Sec. 29 of an act to amend an act entitled “An act to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Squires v. WallichsNebraska Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Norfolk Beet-Sugar Co. v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Terrell v. MiddletonTexas Supreme Court · 1916
  3. McCombs v. Dallas CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. State Ex Rel. Meyer v. DuxburyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Fischer v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API