Legal Opinion

Fennell v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1869PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Guadalupe. Tried below before Hon. J. J. Thornton. The record presents no question of fact.

1Opinion of the CourtLindsay, J.

This was an indictment, as if at the common law, for the crime of sodomy. A motion was made in the court below to quash the indictment. The motion was overruled by the court, and this is assigned as error.

The third article of the general provisions of the Criminal Code, Paschal’s Digest, Art. 1605, declares that, “in order that the system of penal law in force in this State may be complete within itself, and that no system of foreign laws, written or unwritten, may be appealed to, it is declared that no person shall be punished for any act or omission as a penal oifense, unless the same is…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pruett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  2. State v. RandleTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Frazier v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Ex parte BergenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API