Legal Opinion

Feibel v. Sheriff

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1976No. 8644Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to warrant prosecution of Fred Leopold Feibel and James Arthur McCulIy for the crime of unlawfully employing, inducing or using a minor to transport or carry a controlled substance (marijuana), a felony under NRS 453.401(2).

The only probative evidence of record, suggesting such a crime occurred, is that after an automobile (camper) accident appellant McCully placed a quantity of marijuana in his eleven (11) year old son’s suitcase, which contained clothes belonging to both McCully and to his son; and, that McCulIy then placed the…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hammond v. Sheriff, Mineral CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API