Legal Opinion

Tabor v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 2011No. SD 30534PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY W. LYNCH, Judge.

Michael A. Tabor (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. 1 Movant contends that counsel was ineffective, first, for opening the door for — and failing to object to — evidence of uncharged acts and, second, for failing to submit a lesser-included-offense instruction to the jury. Finding no merit in Movant’s claims, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

On the afternoon of February 24, 2004, Movant and Robert Swiek spent several hours trying to catch a nine-month-old colt in an effort to halter…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  4. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. State v. ShurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. KARL DAVID LAWRENCE, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. Victor D. Vickers, Jr. v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API