Guinand v. Walton
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff, Jerome E. Guinand, sued in contract to recover 3% commission on sales and 10% of the assets of Walton-Kearns partnership for services rendered to it. The defenses relied on by the partnership, are: no valid contract; no consideration; and the statute of frauds. Upon trial the district court found that letter set out below on which plaintiff placed reliance did not constitute a valid contract, but never-, theless, on the basis of the whole evidence, - granted plaintiff judgment for his commissions and the 10% of the partnership assets. Defendants appeal.
It…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zancanaro v. CrossArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Continental Bank and Trust Company v. BybeeUtah Supreme Court · 1957
- Stark v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Barrett v. VickersUtah Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by12 opinions
- Microbiological Research Corp. v. MunaUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Jenkins v. PercivalUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- English v. Standard Optical Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- Smith v. OsguthorpeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
- Skousen v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.