Legal Opinion

Guinand v. Walton

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1969No. 11153PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff, Jerome E. Guinand, sued in contract to recover 3% commission on sales and 10% of the assets of Walton-Kearns partnership for services rendered to it. The defenses relied on by the partnership, are: no valid contract; no consideration; and the statute of frauds. Upon trial the district court found that letter set out below on which plaintiff placed reliance did not constitute a valid contract, but never-, theless, on the basis of the whole evidence, - granted plaintiff judgment for his commissions and the 10% of the partnership assets. Defendants appeal.

It…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zancanaro v. CrossArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Continental Bank and Trust Company v. BybeeUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Stark v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Barrett v. VickersUtah Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Microbiological Research Corp. v. MunaUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Jenkins v. PercivalUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. English v. Standard Optical Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  4. Smith v. OsguthorpeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  5. Skousen v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API