Legal Opinion

Franciscus v. Martin

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1845PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from St. Louis Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

This was a proceeding, on a motion and rule, made on the appellee, Martin, to show cause why a judgment obtained by him in the St. Louis court of common pleas, and the proceedings thereon, should not be set aside, for reasons filed. The order of the court disposing of this proceeding, is in these words: “And forasmuch as the court cannot take cognizance of the rule herein, it is ordered that the said rule be discharged, and the motion therefor be dismissed out of court.” We are rather inclined to the opinion, this is a proper case for a mandamus, but as the appellee is not disposed to press…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Brandon v. HickeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Ex parte SkaggsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
  3. Baker v. St. Francis Levee DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Bastan v. Board of TrusteesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Bowersock v. Missouri Valley Drainage DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API