Legal Opinion

Elmer L. Johnson v. Paul Prast, Harold Smith v. Ramon L. Gray

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 9, 1977No. 76-1550, 76-1582PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TONE, Circuit Judge.

These habeas-corpus actions challenge state sentences as having been imposed without consideration of presentence custody resulting from defendants’ financial inability to make bail. In Faye v. Gray, 541 F.2d 665 (7th Cir. 1976), this court held that the equal-protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires a state sentencing judge to consider such presentence custody in sentencing, even though the total time imposed by the sentence and the presentence custody does not exceed the statutory maximum. Left undecided by that case is the question now before us: whether…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. McGinnis v. RoysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. J. Loyd Parker, Jr. v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Klimas v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. PhelanWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hammond v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. Bruneau v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. LohnesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API