Legal Opinion

Holsclaw v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 12, 1985No. 8 Div. 243PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMillan, judge.

From a denial of appellant’s petition for writ of error coram nobis, after an eviden-tiary hearing on the merits, this appeal follows. For the reasons outlined below, the decision of the trial court is affirmed.

On December 8, 1980, the appellant was convicted of the offense of theft of an automobile, in violation of § 13A-8-3(b), Code of Alabama (1975), and sentenced as a habitual offender to life imprisonment. On appeal, this court affirmed the conviction and sentence. Holsclaw v. State, 406 So.2d 1019 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert, denied, 406 So.2d 1020 (Ala.1981). The sole issue…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  3. Bies v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Holsclaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  5. Waldon v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hill v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Holsclaw v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Hill v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Holsclaw v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API