Billips v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBenton, J.
I concur with the majority’s holding regarding the first two issues raised on appeal. I dissent, however, from the holding on the third issue because I believe that plethysmographs are as unreliable as polygraphs. I would hold that the trial judge erred by permitting plethysmograph results into evidence as a factor in assessing punishment upon Matthew Edward Billips. Therefore, I would reverse the sentences and remand for re-sentencing.
“Generally, when a specific objection is made to evidence or when inquiry is made by the trial judge concerning the purpose of evidence, the proponent of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Grady William PowersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- O'Dell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Spencer v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.