Legal Opinion

United States v. Miguel Nieto

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 27, 2013No. 12-50500PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:

This appeal arises out of the convictions and sentences of four defendants, Miguel Nieto, Ramon Morales, Carlos Hernandez, and Santos Almanza. The indictment charged three counts: (1) racketeering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”); (2) conspiracy to racketeer in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) of RICO; and (3) conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute controlled substances in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. Nieto, Hernandez, and Almanza were charged with and convicted on all…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Renico v. LettSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  2. United States v. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  3. Bobby Brown v. Bryan CollierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. David L. BradfordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. Byron JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API