Legal Opinion
Atika v. Sealaska Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 4, 1994No. Nos. 93-35187, 93-35258PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Sealaska Corp. appeals the district court’s denial of its motion to enjoin Shee Atika, Inc. permanently from using Sealaska’s rock, sand, and gravel without Sealaska’s consent. Shee Atika cross appeals. We dismiss Shee Atika’s cross appeal, and affirm the district court’s order denying Sealaska’s request for an injunction.
BACKGROUND
Sealaska is a regional corporation, formed pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), 43 U.S.C. § 1606. Shee Atika is an urban corporation formed under ANCSA, 43 U.S.C. § 1613(h)(3). Shee Atika owns the surface estate in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- I.A.M. National Pension Fund Benefit Plan a v. Cooper Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Atwood Turnkey Drilling, Inc. v. Petroleo Brasileiro, S.A. v. International Underwater ContractorsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Elizabeth Nye Woodard, Miles Cogley Nye, Jr., and the Kendall Company v. Sage Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Thomas Knight A/k/a, Askari Abdullah Muhammad v. Richard L. Dugger and Tom BartonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shee Atika, Plaintiff-Counterclaim v. Sealaska Corp., Defendant-Counterclaimant Shee Atika, Plaintiff-Counterclaim v. Sealaska Corp., Defendant-Counterclaimant Atikon Forest Products, Inc. Silver Bay Logging, Incorporated, Defendants-Counterclaimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Las Vegas Sun, Inc. v. AdelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025