Legal Opinion

Holliday v. Hughes

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 3, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before Townsend, J., fall term, 1897. Foreclosure by J. W. Flolliday v. C. A. Hughes, F. D. Hughes, and W. H. Howell. From judgment for defendant Howell, plaintiff appeals. No citations on point ruled. No citations on point ruled.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice McIver.

This was an action to foreclose a mortgage on real estate, given by the defendants, C. A. Hughes and F. D. Hughes, to the plaintiff, on the 16th of June, 1886, to secure the payment of a bond of same date *156to said plaintiff for the sum of $544.85, with interest from date at the rate of ten per cent, per annum. The complaint is in the usual form, with the additional allegation “that the defendant, W. H. Howell, claims to have acquired an interest in the mortgaged land subsequent to the date of the mortgage.” The defendants, C. A.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Standard Warehouse Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  2. Southern Railway-Carolina Division v. HowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  3. Keenan v. LeslieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  4. Godfrey v. E. P. Burton Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  5. Jenkins v. JenkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API