Polar Tankers, Inc. v. City of Valdez, Alaska
Supreme Court of the United States
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA
1Concurring in the judgmentJustice Alito
I join the opinion of the Court, except for Part II-B-2, which might be read to suggest that the tax at issue here would be permitted under the Tonnage Clause if the tax were a property tax levied in the same manner on other personal property within the jurisdiction. It is sufficient for present purposes that the Valdez tax is not such a personal *20property tax and therefore, even if the Tonnage Clause permits a true, evenhanded property tax to be applied to vessels, the Valdez tax is an unconstitutional duty of tonnage.
2DissentJustice Stevens, joined by Justice Souter
The Tonnage Clause prohibits the States and their political subdivisions…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Smith v. TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Ohio Oil Co. v. ConwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Central Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.