Legal Opinion

McGuffey v. Humes

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from tlie Chancery Court of Knox County. January Term, 1885. W. B. Staley, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtEolkes, J.

This is a hill filed to recover upon the warranty contained in a deed made by Respondent Humes to Complainant'MeGuffey and his *27intestate, J. R. Johnson, conveying seven lots in the city of Knoxville for a recited consideration of $950, the receipt of which was acknowledged.

The deed contains a general covenant of warranty, and a special covenant to pay the purchase-money due by Humes to his vendor, McAnally.

Humes having failed to pay the purchase-money, the lots were sold under a vendor’s bill, brought by McAnally against Humes, the sale being confirmed in May, 1879.

The Chancellor decreed that…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Madden v. Caldwell Land Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Wiggins v. StephensTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  3. Mengel Box Co. v. FergusonTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Wiggins v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API