Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Fink v. Reimer

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 14, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

This is a return to a writ of habeas corpus. The relator, Nathan Fink, has been ordered deported and now petitions for his release.

The following facts are not disputed: In February, 1927, the relator, a citizen of Poland, secured from the American Consulate at Warsaw a preference quota immigration visa under the name of Markus Apfelroth. The real Apfelroth had a son in New York City, who was an American citizen. Apfelroth was thus entitled to a preference “under the Polish quota. The son had petitioned for the admission of his father, and a preference visa had been…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Phillippides v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States ex rel. Grimaldi v. EbeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926
  3. McCandless v. United States ex rel. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
  4. United States ex rel. Cherwonick v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  5. United States ex rel. Murphy v. McCandlessDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Mohammed JabatehCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. ShapiroDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API