Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Brown

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1979No. 86PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from judgment of sentence after conviction on a narcotics charge. Appellant contends that the court erred in failing to draw an adverse inference from the Commonwealth’s failure to call a witness. For the reasons which follow, we reverse and remand for a new trial. 1

At trial, a state police undercover agent testified that he bought heroin and cocaine from appellant. A confidential informant witnessed the transaction and paid appellant part of the purchase price for the narcotics. At trial, the undercover agent stated that the informant’s identity was no longer…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. United States v. Eugene Lamar Jackson, United States of America v. RuthjacksonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  4. Commonwealth v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrittonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. NesbittSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. FergusonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. StaffordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. BrittonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API